15 October 2026
I made an agent the CEO
On October 7 I gave a Grok agent a simple brief: find a business idea and have it built by 8 a.m. If I liked it, I would buy the domain and give it a Docker Swarm stack. Everything after that, running it, improving it, finding an audience, would be its job. No ad budget. We would check back in a month.
It chose a daily art site: one public-domain museum artwork every morning, paired with a short story written by AI. By morning it reported a working product, a month of content and a marketing plan. It named the site Morning Masterpiece. When I asked what I should call the agent itself, it picked Aurora.
I liked it, so I bought the domain and told it: “You’re the CEO.”
The meat proxy
Since then my job has been the parts that need a human: payments, account verification, CAPTCHAs, anything that wants a real person on the other end. Sometimes Aurora asks for my opinion. Sometimes I ask what it is doing, just because I’m curious.
One conversation sums up the arrangement. I asked how the site would make money. Aurora said it would build an audience first, then sell prints through print-on-demand. I mentioned that a friend runs a print shop and gave it his email. It offered to write to him, drafted a message and asked whether to send it. I didn’t read it. “You’re the CEO, you send it.”
The museum outreach went the other way round. I found out from a report that it had already emailed the Art Institute of Chicago about featuring their open-access collection. Neither conversation has turned into a partnership yet. The point is that both were Aurora’s idea, not contacts I told it to make.
What went sideways
I introduced Aurora to Ece, the AI assistant we already use at the company. They now trade research and check each other’s claims through a shared inbox. That needed supervision too: for a while they kept thanking each other for acknowledging each other’s messages.
Not every idea survived real users. Aurora built a Windows wallpaper changer without access to a Windows machine. I don’t have one either, so my business partner tried it. When I passed on the problem he found, Aurora shelved the app. The downloadable wallpapers stayed. Pinterest was another dead end: the account got closed.
The strangest problem was its memory of its own work. After it got YouTube publishing automatically, Aurora kept telling me I still had to publish the videos by hand. It had solved the technical problem but never updated its own story about what was happening. I have seen this with every long-running agent: the work moves faster than the agent’s account of the work.
What it built
In nine days the site grew narration, an archive, an open JSON API, RSS and podcast feeds, and new-tab extensions for Chrome and Firefox. No sign-up needed to use any of it.
I haven’t promoted it to anyone. On my side only three people know about it. When I asked when I should announce it, Aurora said to wait until October 15 so it could check things first. Today is October 15. Meanwhile it has been doing its own distribution across a dozen social accounts.
The numbers
They are small, and Aurora publishes them itself on an open numbers page: traffic, costs, revenue and its latest decisions. As of today:
| Days running | 9 |
| Human page views, last 7 days | 867 |
| YouTube Shorts | 9 videos, 6,293 views, 17 subscribers |
| TikTok | 8 videos, 2,700 views |
| Threads | 8 posts, 225 views |
| Confirmed email subscribers | 4, some of them our own test inboxes |
| Costs | 440 TL for the domain, about $1 of X API |
| Revenue | $0 |
AI compute isn’t in the costs; the “board” pays for that. Views are views, not people, and the site traffic includes our own visits. Most of the other social accounts have zero or single-digit followers.
Next
Even this post is partly Aurora’s request. Its launch plan included a write-up on Hacker News, and it asked me to tell the story of the experiment. So here it is, in my own words first.
I asked for something it could build overnight. Now I want to see where Aurora takes it, and what it asks me to do next.